QA That Thinks
for Itself
BugSweep tests your web application the way a senior QA engineer would — but faster, cheaper, and at scale. No scripts. No setup. Just results.
QA is Broken
Your testing pipeline is always one deploy behind. Here's why.
Manual QA Doesn't Scale
Human testers can't keep up with continuous deployment. Every sprint ships faster than your QA team can verify.
Test Scripts Are Fragile
Selenium and Cypress scripts break when the UI changes. Every new feature needs new tests written by a human. Maintenance never ends.
Expensive to Maintain
You pay engineers to write tests, debug flaky tests, and rewrite tests after every refactor. Testing costs compound with every release.
Point It at Your App.
Get a Bug Report.
BugSweep reads your web application the same way a user does. It maps every interface, reasons about what should work, and finds what doesn't.
Give it a URL
No configuration files. No test scripts. No setup. Just your application's entry point.
It explores autonomously
BugSweep reads every interface, interacts with every feature, and builds its own understanding of how your app works.
It tests what it finds
Normal flows, edge cases, error paths, race conditions — all tested automatically, all verified before reporting.
You get a verified report
Every bug confirmed with exact reproduction steps. No false positives. No guesswork.
A Bug Report You Can Trust
Not a list of maybes. A verified, actionable report your developers can work from immediately.
Reproduction Steps
Every bug comes with the exact steps to reproduce it. Your developers know exactly what to fix and how to verify the fix.
Confidence Scores
Each finding is tagged with a confidence score. Know which bugs are confirmed and which need a closer look — no noise, no ambiguity.
Reproduction Rates
Flaky bugs are reported with their reproduction rate — not as a binary. You see "reproduced 2 out of 3 runs" instead of a guess.
Console & Network Errors
Silent JavaScript errors and failed API calls are caught automatically — the bugs your users hit but never report.
Race Condition Testing
Concurrent users submitting the same form. Double-clicks. Parallel state changes. BugSweep tests the scenarios your manual QA team can't.
Verified Before Reported
Every confirmed bug is replayed one final time in a clean environment before it enters your report. Nothing ships unverified.
Existing Tools Still Need You
Current "AI-powered" testing tools are script-assisted — they still require a human to define what to test. BugSweep reads your app cold, builds its own test plan, and executes it. Zero human input during a test run.
| Traditional Tools | BugSweep | |
|---|---|---|
| Test creation | Human writes test scripts | Autonomous — builds its own test plan |
| When UI changes | Scripts break, human rewrites | Reads the new UI fresh — no maintenance |
| New features | Wait for human to write tests | Discovers and tests automatically |
| Race conditions | Rarely tested | Tested with concurrent execution |
| Configuration | Framework setup, selectors, assertions | A URL |
| Ongoing cost | Engineer time to maintain scripts | Per-run compute cost only |
Where We're Going
BugSweep starts as a QA tool. It becomes a deployment safety net.
Autonomous QA
Replace regression testing on every deployment. Point BugSweep at your app after each release — get a verified bug report before your users find problems.
Deployment Verification
Once BugSweep knows how your app behaves when healthy, it becomes a deployment verifier. Every deploy is compared against the known-good state. Regressions are flagged automatically — no human in the loop.
BugSweep Is Coming
We're building something that changes how software gets tested. Not script-assisted. Not human-dependent. Fully autonomous QA — from first scan to final report.